Portals eNewsletters Web Seminars dataWarehouse.com DM Review Magazine
DM Review | Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics
   Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics Advanced Search
advertisement

Resource Portals
Business Intelligence
Business Performance Management
Data Integration
Data Quality
Data Warehousing Basics
EAI
EDM
EII
ETL
More Portals...

Advertisement

Information Center
DM Review Home
Web Seminars & Archives
Newsletters
Current Magazine Issue
Magazine Archives
Online Columnists
Ask the Experts
Industry News
Search DM Review

General Resources
Bookstore
Industry Events Calendar
Vendor Listings
White Paper Library
Glossary
Software Demo Lab
Monthly Product Guides
Buyer's Guide

General Resources
About Us
Press Releases
Awards
Media Kit
Reprints
Magazine Subscriptions
Editorial Calendar
Contact Us
Customer Service

Ask the Experts Question and Answer

Ask the Expert

Meet the Experts
Ask a Question (Names of individuals and companies will not be used.)
Question Archive
Ask the Experts Home

Q:

I am trying to prove a business case to demonstrate the quantifiable business benefits of implementing data standards to support our heterogeneous ERP environment.

Any helpful thoughts and advice would be appreciated. Specifically, I am looking for some figures to support a process flow diagram i.e., what is the % likelihood of an error during transcription of data? I am trying to show that if we create the data once, according to agreed upon standards, then to electronically transmit that information, it is less likely to introduce an error into the process.

A:

Sid Adelman?s Answer: The benefits of data standards are hard to quantify and are usually only realized in the long term. This is going to be a tough sell unless you have enlightened management who expect to be around for a few more years and are willing to make the investment.

Clay Rehm?s Answer: I think this effort will be truly difficult if not impossible. Even after you have found the %, will it really convince anybody in power to follow a specific standard? Don't get me wrong, I completely support and am a big advocate for following data standards, but I have always felt that it is more effective to get people to follow along by example than by a directive.

Scott Howard?s Answer: I'm not aware of any work performed and published to support your case. However, allow me to share an effective example that most can relate to. Consider NASA's recent track record for their Mars probes. What happened about two years ago? NASA admitted that the probe crashed into the side of Mars. Why? Well a credit to NASA's honesty, they admitted that one engineering team used metric standards and another used imperial standards. No consideration for these differences was accounted for when calculating things like weights and balances, fuel load and trajectories. It's as if your financial DW joined U.S. dollars to the Euro and then to the Turkish Lira without considering the implications. Now out comes the Oliver Stone in me as I suspect the same thing happened to NASA's second probe. After all, wasn't it already in route when the original standardization error was detected?

I usually cite this very example when advocating standardizing and reconciling source input to the DW. I usually also state that your business too can crash into Mars if you don't standardize your source input, after which I'm also usually thrown out of such meetings. ;-)

(Posted )


ARCHIVE OF QUESTIONS & ANSWERS FOR STRATEGIC INTELLIGENCE
BACK TO THE LIST OF CATEGORIES



Advertisement
advertisement
Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
SourceMedia (c) 2005 DM Review and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited.