Portals eNewsletters Web Seminars dataWarehouse.com DM Review Magazine
DM Review | Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics
   Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics Advanced Search
advertisement

RESOURCE PORTALS
View all Portals

WEB SEMINARS
Scheduled Events

RESEARCH VAULT
White Paper Library
Research Papers

CAREERZONE
View Job Listings
Post a job

Advertisement

INFORMATION CENTER
DM Review Home
Newsletters
Current Magazine Issue
Magazine Archives
Online Columnists
Ask the Experts
Industry News
Search DM Review

GENERAL RESOURCES
Bookstore
Buyer's Guide
Glossary
Industry Events Calendar
Monthly Product Guides
Software Demo Lab
Vendor Listings

DM REVIEW
About Us
Press Releases
Awards
Advertising/Media Kit
Reprints
Magazine Subscriptions
Editorial Calendar
Contact Us
Customer Service

Knowledge Integrity:
Archaeology and Intelligence

  Column published in DM Review Magazine
January 2003 Issue
 
  By David Loshin

In a recent newspaper article, a group of scientists revealed their beliefs about the diet of humans 5,000 years ago. Their beliefs were based on the analysis of the contents of the stomach of the Iceman, a prehistoric man whose remains were discovered by tourists in the Italian Alps. Based both on the kinds of food he had eaten (cereals as well as venison) and the way that he was killed (by an arrowhead in his left shoulder), these scientists suggested that his death might have been the result of rivalry between different hunting gangs. It is interesting that these scientists are discussing details of an event that took place several millennia ago, based on inferences drawn from a "witness" that had been dead for centuries.

These scientists are not alone; anyone with a healthy set of data, a couple of analysis tools and some insight should be able to reconstruct a set of scenarios based on a limited set of evidentiary elements. At a crime scene, the investigators collect as much evidence as they can - fingerprints, hair and skin for DNA analysis, mud prints. The environment of the crime scene is evaluated as well. By accumulating as much evidence as possible, the clever detective will be able to make enough inferences about the criminal to form a valid profile, which can then be used to locate the evildoer.

Similarly, archaeologists working with bits and pieces of bone or the reflection of a skeletal structure imprinted in an ancient fossil draw conclusions not just about the bone infrastructure of dinosaurs, but about all aspects of these old-time animals' lives. For example, by finding embedded seed or leaf images within a fossil, a scientist can infer a lot about the diet and biology of the fossilized creature.

Abstractly, what these scientists are doing is evaluating the evidence of some attribute or behavior and then drawing inferences about the subject based on that evidence. These inferences are then used to explore some thesis about the subject, the results of which can then be evaluated for correctness.

I'll venture to say that in some situations, people are very similar to the dinosaurs mentioned earlier. In almost every action we take, we leave behind some evidence. By evaluating the kinds of actions or the sequence of actions that people take when they need to make decisions, we can make inferences about both the way that certain decisions are made and the personality profiles of the people making those decisions.

These are two powerful concepts. The first implies that if we can identify a sequence of events that lead toward a particular action, then we can predict if that action will be taken by tracking the event sequences. This is particularly valuable when it comes to customer life cycle events. For example, at what point does someone stop shopping and start buying? Or, what are the events that lead customers to close their bank accounts?

The second concept implies that we can cluster individuals into personality profiles by looking at the kinds of actions they perform. This is interesting when we have a limited amount of resources to dedicate to some business process and we want to maximize our benefit. For example, we might make the inference that individuals who purchase fast food or gourmet take-out dinners after 10:00 p.m. five nights a week are likely to be leading a lifestyle that is not consistent with having small children. Therefore, those people would not be good prospects for purchasing minivans.

There are three challenges for exploiting this kind of analysis:

  1. Identify those actions that are of interest and create a mechanism for logging and archiving that information. For example, in a clothing store, picking up a folded shirt and unfolding it might be considered a unique customer activity that should be logged.
  2. Create an analytical framework for determining sequences of events that lead to success indicators. For example, how many times did a person visit a Web site and view a product's information sheet before purchasing it?
  3. Enable the enhancement of activity information with alternate value-added data, such as demographics, psychographics, geographic information, etc.

Unfortunately, it is relatively uncommon for an organization to have its act together enough to properly exploit this kind of analysis. In the best environment, this can lead to laser-perfect targeting. In the worst case, this leads to huge, unmanageable databases; overtaxed processing systems; and a bunch of unhappy clients. The attempt to discover "success patterns" can get bogged down with the discovery of a bunch of irrelevant conclusions that don't add value. A good approach is to start with one or two known success patterns and then formulate a pilot project to validate that those patterns can be recognized within the set of actions. This acts as a "proof of concept," and a success during this pilot should encourage expansion of this kind of analysis.

...............................................................................

For more information on related topics visit the following related portals...
CRM, Data Analysis, Database Marketing and Customer Acquisition/Retention.

David Loshin is the president of Knowledge Integrity, Inc., a consulting and development company focusing on customized information management solutions including information quality solutions consulting, information quality training and business rules solutions. Loshin is the author of Enterprise Knowledge Management - The Data Quality Approach (Morgan Kaufmann, 2001) and Business Intelligence - The Savvy Manager's Guide and is a frequent speaker on maximizing the value of information. Loshin may be reached at loshin@knowledge-integrity.com.

Solutions Marketplace
Provided by IndustryBrains

TechExcel CRM
TechExcel CRM sets the standard for high-end CRM: powerful, configurable, affordable and easy to use.

Numara Track-It! Help Desk & CRM Software
Numara IT Solutions provides Track-It! - the leading help desk software solution for employee & customer self-help, call tracking, problem resolution, remote control, asset management, LAN/PC auditing, and electronic software distribution. Free demo

Customer Relationship Management for IT
Web-based CRM and more with Autotask: Great business management software optimizes resources and track billable project and service work. Get a demo, then try it free with sample data. Click here for your free trial!

Data Mining: Levels I, II & III
Do you know who your best customers are and why? Learn how to anticipate customer behavior using your existing data with predictive modeling. View upcoming events in data mining.

Strategic CRM Analytics White Paper
This white paper explores how companies can extend their CRM applications by using BI tools to turn CRM data into actionable information to drive strategic decision-making and improve ROI.

Click here to advertise in this space


View Full Issue View Full Magazine Issue
E-mail This Column E-Mail This Column
Printer Friendly Version Printer-Friendly Version
Related Content Related Content
Request Reprints Request Reprints
Advertisement
advertisement
Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
SourceMedia (c) 2006 DM Review and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
SourceMedia is an Investcorp company.
Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited.