Portals eNewsletters Web Seminars dataWarehouse.com DM Review Magazine
DM Review | Information Is Your Business
   Information Is Your Business Advanced Search
advertisement

RESOURCE PORTALS
Business Intelligence
Compliance
Corporate Performance Management
Data Integration
Data Quality
Data Warehousing Basics
ETL
Master Data Management
View all Portals

WEB SEMINARS
Scheduled Events

RESEARCH VAULT
White Paper Library
Research Papers

CAREERZONE

Advertisement

INFORMATION CENTER
DM Review Home
Newsletters
Current Magazine Issue
Magazine Archives
DM Review Extended Edition
Online Columnists
Ask the Experts
Industry News
Search DM Review

GENERAL RESOURCES
Tech Evaluation Center:
Evaluate IT solutions
Bookstore
Buyer's Guide
Glossary
Industry Events Calendar
Software Demo Lab
Vendor Listings

DM REVIEW
About Us
Press Releases
Awards
Advertising/Media Kit
Reprints
Magazine Subscriptions
Editorial Calendar
Contact Us
Customer Service

Data Integration Adviser:
Communication Breakdown: The Achilles' Heel of BI Projects

  Column published in DM Review Magazine
November 2006 Issue
 
  By Rick Sherman

What we've got here is failure to communicate.
         - Captain in the 1967 film Cool Hand Luke

What is the most likely cause of failed business intelligence (BI) and data warehousing (DW) projects? Not technology shortcomings, as one might expect. Unfortunately, the more common reason they fail is that they don't meet business expectations.

Although this failure can be subtle, the effects are still devastating. Often the IT group doesn't realize that the BI/DW initiative has not lived up to the business group's expectations. Or, the project simply cost too much in time, resources and budget. Even if there is no outward hostility from the business users, they will show their dissatisfaction by building their own data shadow systems to get the business value they thought they were going to get from your BI solution. (See my May 2006 DM Review column for more on data shadow systems.)

The first reaction may be to blame the BI/DW group for not involving the business users in the project. But in reality, business users are routinely involved in the requirements-gathering activities, BI tool selection, report specifications, creation and business transformations definition. Many IT groups use a governance process that involves business management in a steering committee and business users in BI working groups. If IT groups are involving the business, why are expectations not being met?

There are two key ingredients to setting and meeting business expectations (assuming the IT group can deliver the technology solution): communication and marketing.

Open Communication Lines

Everybody's talking at me, I don't hear a word they're saying.
         - "Everybody's Talkin'" by Fred Neil, sung by Harry Nilsson

For communication to be effective, it must be with the right people and involve two-way discussions. The most common communication shortcomings in BI/DW projects are:

  • Overreliance on business power users. Power users are the businesspeople most involved in using data and technology for reporting and analysis. It is natural that they are the business users with whom IT most closely works. However, they may provide a barrier to two-way feedback. Plus, they are also the people who develop the data shadow systems that are competing with the BI solution.
  • Wrong (and unmotivated) people. The IT governance committees may have neither the right people to make or influence decisions on the steering committee nor the right people to get the tasks done in the working committee. The members of these committees need to feel they are involved and encouraged to provide honest feedback. Too often, these committees become more about process than communication.
  • A bogged-down feedback loop. The formal processes created for providing BI feedback and enhancement requests may have become so bureaucratic or time-consuming that business users give up in frustration. If all the work goes into the request process rather than fulfilling the request, the business users will seek answers elsewhere, such as in data shadow systems or listening to software vendors pitch the latest prebuilt BI solution to replace the current BI efforts.

The best communication is open and frank. When a project is taking longer than expected, discuss this fact and the reasons behind it with the business users. Projects can be slowed down when the data integration effort is snagged by the state of the data or when the reports the business users initially specified are a lot more involved than anticipated. These are not uncommon occurrences, but they need to be openly discussed and managed.

The business and IT groups should share the responsibility for any tradeoffs or project extensions. In addition, slow creep of little snags must also be communicated and managed. Many projects keep moving forward with the DW group doing a great job of handling these small snags, only to be hit with a death by a thousand needles. The business will not know your truly Herculean efforts unless they are kept informed. If they find out afterward, when you have missed your deadlines and gone over budget, it only sounds like excuses.

Meeting Expectations, Avoiding Surprises

Don't provide the opportunity for business users to think your BI/DW project hasn't met expectations, or worse, is a failure. Make effective use of two-way communications to ensure you meet expectations and avoid unwelcome surprises. In my next column I will discuss the internal marketing efforts you should use to increase the use of your BI solution by the business community and their satisfaction with the BI solution. 

...............................................................................

For more information on related topics visit the following related portals...
Business Intelligence (BI) and Data Integration.

Rick Sherman has more than 20 years of business intelligence and data warehousing experience, having worked on more than 50 implementations as a director/practice leader at PricewaterhouseCoopers and while managing his own firm. He is the founder of Athena IT Solutions, a Boston-based consulting firm that provides data warehouse and business intelligence consulting, training and vendor services. Sherman is a published author of over 50 articles, an industry speaker, a DM Review World Class Solution Awards judge, a data management expert at searchdatamanagement.com and has been quoted in CFO and Business Week. Sherman can be found blogging on performance management, data warehouse and business intelligence topics at The Data Doghouse.You can reach him at rsherman@athena-solutions.com or (617) 835-0546.

In addition to teaching at industry conferences, Sherman offers on-site data warehouse/business intelligence training, which can be customized and teaches public courses in the Boston area. He also teaches data warehousing at Northeastern University 's graduate school of engineering.

 



View Full Issue View Full Magazine Issue
E-mail This Column E-Mail This Column
Printer Friendly Version Printer-Friendly Version
Related Content Related Content
Request Reprints Request Reprints
Advertisement
advertisement
Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
SourceMedia (c) 2007 DM Review and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
SourceMedia is an Investcorp company.
Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited.