Portals eNewsletters Web Seminars dataWarehouse.com DM Review Magazine
DM Review | Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics
   Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics Advanced Search
advertisement

RESOURCE PORTALS
View all Portals

WEB SEMINARS
Scheduled Events

RESEARCH VAULT
White Paper Library
Research Papers

CAREERZONE
View Job Listings
Post a job

Advertisement

INFORMATION CENTER
DM Review Home
Newsletters
Current Magazine Issue
Magazine Archives
Online Columnists
Ask the Experts
Industry News
Search DM Review

GENERAL RESOURCES
Bookstore
Buyer's Guide
Glossary
Industry Events Calendar
Monthly Product Guides
Software Demo Lab
Vendor Listings

DM REVIEW
About Us
Press Releases
Awards
Advertising/Media Kit
Reprints
Magazine Subscriptions
Editorial Calendar
Contact Us
Customer Service

Sarbanes-Oxley Risks Associated with Linux

    Online News published in DMReview.com
January 26, 2006

Many companies using Linux for embedded applications may be unwittingly violating the Linux license and even breaking federal securities laws, according to a white paper released by Wasabi Systems, an embedded operating systems provider. The white paper, When GPL Violations are Sarbanes-Oxley violations, is the first in a series of legal studies analyzing the common misperceptions and risks associated with Linux and its license, the GNU general public license (GPL). Future white papers will look at the GPL implications of loadable kernel modules (LKM) and how upstream GPL violations impact VARs and end users.

"Linux is a powerful operating system," says Jay Michaelson, an author of the white paper and Wasabi Systems' General Counsel. "But if companies violate the license, the consequences can be more severe than they think." He notes that Wasabi uses open source software in its products, including very careful use of software governed by the GPL.

According to Michaelson, the problem lies with the requirement of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, passed in 2002, that companies disclose ownership of intellectual property to their shareholders. Michaelson says that dozens of companies are discovered each year to have violated the terms of the GPL, and if they are public companies, they are violating Sarbanes-Oxley. "If companies are violating the GPL, they don't have the right to use that software," asserts Michaelson. "And if they don't have the right to use the software, they're violating federal law if they claim that they do."

The extent of this problem remains unclear. The Free Software Foundation, which is the primary enforcer of the GPL, reports that it pursues "several dozen" enforcement actions each year. In the past, such violators were merely required to release their code to the public. Now, Michaelson says, "Sarbanes changes the picture completely. For public companies, violating the Linux license is now a matter of federal securities law."

...............................................................................

For more information on related topics visit the following related portals...
Compliance and Linux.

This piece has been brought to you by the DM Review Editorial staff.



E-mail This Online News E-Mail This Online News
Printer Friendly Version Printer-Friendly Version
Related Content Related Content
Request Reprints Request Reprints
Advertisement
advertisement
Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
SourceMedia (c) 2006 DM Review and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
SourceMedia is an Investcorp company.
Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited.