Portals eNewsletters Web Seminars dataWarehouse.com DM Review Magazine
DM Review | Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics
   Covering Business Intelligence, Integration & Analytics Advanced Search
advertisement

RESOURCE PORTALS
View all Portals

WEB SEMINARS
Scheduled Events

RESEARCH VAULT
White Paper Library
Research Papers

CAREERZONE
View Job Listings
Post a job

Advertisement

INFORMATION CENTER
DM Review Home
Newsletters
Current Magazine Issue
Magazine Archives
Online Columnists
Ask the Experts
Industry News
Search DM Review

GENERAL RESOURCES
Bookstore
Buyer's Guide
Glossary
Industry Events Calendar
Monthly Product Guides
Software Demo Lab
Vendor Listings

DM REVIEW
About Us
Press Releases
Awards
Advertising/Media Kit
Reprints
Magazine Subscriptions
Editorial Calendar
Contact Us
Customer Service

Knowledge Integrity:
Meta Data, Cooperation and the Federal Government

  Column published in DM Review Magazine
November 2005 Issue
 
  By David Loshin

As a practitioner whose interests in information strategy are relevant in both the public and commercial sectors, I am always intrigued when I see good ideas in one sector that can be applied in practice across many administrative environments. This month's column is about one of those ideas - what it is, what it entails and why I am hopeful for its success.

In the past, I have referred to the ISO/IEC 11179 standard for meta data registries, which is a relatively straightforward specification of a registry for both describing and managing meta data. The standard itself, which can be viewed at http://metadata-standards.org/11179/, provides a very good introduction to meta data concepts, including a lot of insight into some aspects of the granularity of meta data, approaches to its management and suggestions about naming conventions.

There are two aspects to the standard that I find particularly appealing. The first is that because its simplicity lends itself to adaptation, an organization must define its policies and procedures for guiding and governing meta data management. The second is that the representational simplicity allows for easy sharing of meta data, as well as easily enabling the governance workflow within an enterprise or even across enterprises where information is shared.

An effort is being undertaken by representatives from a number of federal agencies in contributing ideas and approaches to sharing meta data. The vision of this group, the Federal Meta Data Management Consortium (FMMC), is to "improve the quality, understandability and efficiency of federal information through the practice of meta data management principles." I can imagine the number of citizens rolling their eyes, thinking, "Not another empty threat of the federal government to improve efficiency."

Fortunately, having attended some meetings and spoken to some of the people involved, I have high hopes for this group's success. The FMMC's stated mission is to "promote sound meta data management principles across federal government agencies through collaborative work in the use of data registries and sharing of meta data, resources, know-how and lessons learned." Practically, though, the members of the group are quite knowledgeable in information management best practices and, in fact, its collective knowledge was demonstrated through a set of comments provided during a review of the Department of Homeland Security's proposed data reference model. It seemed that comments from FMMC members directly addressed some of the more questionable aspects of the proposal.

In essence, the FMMC was formed by people working on 11179-based meta data registries who meet once a month to discuss issues concerning the design and use of these registries. The registries are intended to capture any kind of meta data about information packages. Conceptually, this includes what we usually think of as meta data (e.g., data element names, sizes, types, etc.) but also is intended to incorporate more creatively defined meta data about other kinds of information objects. For example, this would include meta data about photographs (e.g., when was the photograph taken, when was it developed, who took the picture), voicemail messages (e.g., when was it recorded) or video clips (e.g., copyright information).

What I find most interesting about this initiative is the goal of collaborative work. Consider this scenario: there are many federal agencies, and each has some kind of internal information management requirements as well as some information-sharing requirements. Additionally, as has been shown by large-scale disaster situations such as 9/11 and Hurricane Katrina, there is a great need for effective, rapid communication between government agencies. Defining, agreeing to definitions of and sharing meta data for exchanged data are all critical for effective communications. Because people at some agencies have more experience in meta data management than others, the FMMC goal of collaborative work is more than just lip service. FMMC members not only help in directing new efforts, but are also looking at ways to share resources (software, hardware, procedures, etc.) for meta data management for those agencies who are not ready to invest in the infrastructure needed for developing a meta data registry.

It is worthwhile to take a look at the different ways that these agencies are leveraging the 11179 standard - check out these Web sites:

  • The FAA Data Registry: http://fdr.faa.gov/
  • The EPA Data Standards Registry: http://www.epa.gov/edr/
  • The National Cancer Institute's Cancer Data Standards Repository: http://ncicbsupport.nci.nih.gov/sw/content/caDSR.html

At a glance, you can glean a lot of information about different uses of meta data registries from these sites.

Why is this interesting to readers who are not working with the federal government? Mostly because of what we can learn from this example of cooperation. The U.S. government is huge and so is the number of agencies that use or exchange information. If a group of meta data professionals representing a number of different U.S. agencies can sit down to explore how they can collaborate on meta data definitions and representations, it shows that it may be possible for meta data professionals in smaller organizations to do the same. For more information about this group, contact me at loshin@knowledge-integrity.com and I will forward your questions to the right contacts.

...............................................................................

Check out DMReview.com's resource portals for additional related content, white papers, books and other resources.

David Loshin is the president of Knowledge Integrity, Inc., a consulting and development company focusing on customized information management solutions including information quality solutions consulting, information quality training and business rules solutions. Loshin is the author of Enterprise Knowledge Management - The Data Quality Approach (Morgan Kaufmann, 2001) and Business Intelligence - The Savvy Manager's Guide and is a frequent speaker on maximizing the value of information. Loshin may be reached at loshin@knowledge-integrity.com.

Solutions Marketplace
Provided by IndustryBrains

Design Databases with ER/Studio: Free Trial
ER/Studio delivers next-generation data modeling. Multiple, distinct physical models based on a single logical model give you the tools you need to manage complex database environments and critical metadata in an intuitive user interface.

Backup SQL Server or Exchange Continuously
FREE WHITE PAPER. Recover SQL Server, Exchange or NTFS data within minutes with TimeSpring?s continuous data protection (CDP) software. No protection gaps, no scheduling requirements, no backup related slowdowns and no backup windows to manage.

Data Mining: Levels I, II & III
Learn how experts build and deploy predictive models by attending The Modeling Agency's vendor-neutral courses. Leverage valuable information hidden within your data through predictive analytics. Click through to view upcoming events.

KOM Networks Archiving and Data Storage
KOM Networks, a leader in archiving and data storage for more that 37 years, offers organizations a cost effective means to secure their growing data stores.

Manage Data Center from Virtually Anywhere!
Learn how SecureLinx remote IT management products can quickly and easily give you the ability to securely manage data center equipment (servers, switches, routers, telecom equipment) from anywhere, at any time... even if the network is down.

Click here to advertise in this space


View Full Issue View Full Magazine Issue
E-mail This Column E-Mail This Column
Printer Friendly Version Printer-Friendly Version
Related Content Related Content
Request Reprints Request Reprints
Advertisement
advertisement
Site Map Terms of Use Privacy Policy
SourceMedia (c) 2006 DM Review and SourceMedia, Inc. All rights reserved.
SourceMedia is an Investcorp company.
Use, duplication, or sale of this service, or data contained herein, is strictly prohibited.